The Typeclassopedia -- request for feedback
I have just submitted a draft article for inclusion in the Monad.Reader entitled “The Typeclassopedia”. I will let the abstract speak for itself:
I would love feedback from anyone, from the newest newb to the expertest expert, who would be kind enough to take a look. Particular types of feedback I would appreciate include:The standard Haskell libraries feature a number of type classes with algebraic or categorical underpinnings. Becoming a fluent Haskell hacker requires intimate familiarity with them all, yet acquiring this familiarity often involves combing through a mountain of tutorials, blog posts, mailing list archives, and IRC logs.
The goal of this article is to serve as a starting point for the student of Haskell wishing to gain a firm grasp of its standard type classes. The essentials of each type class are introduced, with examples, commentary, and extensive references for further reading.
- Are there parts that are confusing or could be worded more clearly?
- Are there parts that are stated incorrectly?
- Do you know of any additional references that could be included?
I am looking for more references for Foldable, Traversable, and Comonad in particular, so if you know of any good resources/examples/papers related to any of those, please let me know.
At 48 pages and 110 citations, the article is rather hefty, so I certainly don’t expect most people to read through all of it anytime soon—but even if you only take a look at a section or two about which you are particularly interested and/or knowledgeable, your feedback would be greatly appreciated! I hope that this can become a valuable reference for the Haskell community.
Edit, 16 March 2009: a revised and updated version of the Typeclassopedia has now been published in the Monad.Reader.